From nobody Wed Jan 18 12:35:24 2023 X-Original-To: dev-commits-ports-main@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4NxlbY5LlBz2t6Fk; Wed, 18 Jan 2023 12:35:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jaap@NLnetLabs.nl) Received: from bela.nlnetlabs.nl (bela.nlnetlabs.nl [IPv6:2a04:b900::1:0:0:15]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4NxlbX0nK4z4JDM; Wed, 18 Jan 2023 12:35:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jaap@NLnetLabs.nl) Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=nlnetlabs.nl header.s=bela header.b=yqzWernZ; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of jaap@NLnetLabs.nl designates 2a04:b900::1:0:0:15 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=jaap@NLnetLabs.nl; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=nlnetlabs.nl Received: from bela.nlnetlabs.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bela.nlnetlabs.nl (8.17.1/8.16.1) with ESMTPS id 30ICZO6h077254 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 18 Jan 2023 13:35:24 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from jaap@NLnetLabs.nl) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=nlnetlabs.nl; s=bela; t=1674045325; bh=9/KrnMyFgkxco1O+BEJ+vQMj+t2uQ+/CHF/XGKW2RpM=; h=To:cc:Subject:From:In-reply-to:References:Date; b=yqzWernZXPoT68A4PR9KS1fc60iPgm/P/D9Ki6g7AaJpNdXbeBXV1+Jib6EaUs6oB /cNYkyGivRaj8jST5uvHomomVQ8nDBB1IzHYQJp72ASMqzOnyFS04ovldNFzAXTOOk nrmlp9KGEEHe3v5ma0zudxQhs31w7u7Jir4oKldbUheFXbb1Pcc9S0ECIaWYUc9M8S yBRlBPGOHs4viZJJgmRpy5SRMJMq7nUdTuUuHjnLHmcQx8lfcMinX/8GpJu5BqcSQV hEhq0OLmiW5n2Ehr+zLk5X41GZ8+F0VYeidbBlfuC6rzJ4M1A9F4oD49IOTFfrFpQK gwJU2hNng3OLQ== Received: from bela.nlnetlabs.nl (jaap@localhost) by bela.nlnetlabs.nl (8.17.1/8.16.1/Submit) with ESMTP id 30ICZOUD077187; Wed, 18 Jan 2023 13:35:24 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from jaap@NLnetLabs.nl) Message-Id: <202301181235.30ICZOUD077187@bela.nlnetlabs.nl> X-Authentication-Warning: bela.nlnetlabs.nl: jaap owned process doing -bs To: Adam Weinberger cc: =?UTF-8?Q?Fernando_Apestegu=C3=ADa?= , "ports-committers@FreeBSD.org" , dev-commits-ports-all@freebsd.org, dev-commits-ports-main@freebsd.org Subject: Re: git: 38e6e935efa6 - main - dns/unbound: add dynlib port option From: Jaap Akkerhuis In-reply-to: References: <202301161248.30GCmHnK091914@gitrepo.freebsd.org> Comments: In-reply-to Adam Weinberger message dated "Mon, 16 Jan 2023 15:13:37 -0700." List-Id: Commits to the main branch of the FreeBSD ports repository List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/dev-commits-ports-main List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-dev-commits-ports-main@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: dev-commits-ports-main@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <77185.1674045324.1@bela.nlnetlabs.nl> Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2023 13:35:24 +0100 X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-6.00 / 15.00]; DWL_DNSWL_MED(-2.00)[nlnetlabs.nl:dkim]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-0.996]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[nlnetlabs.nl,none]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[nlnetlabs.nl:s=bela]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+a]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_DN_EQ_ADDR_SOME(0.00)[]; MLMMJ_DEST(0.00)[dev-commits-ports-all@freebsd.org,dev-commits-ports-main@freebsd.org]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[nlnetlabs.nl:+]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROMTLD(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_FIVE(0.00)[5]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; HAS_XAW(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:8587, ipnet:2a04:b900::/30, country:NL] X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4NxlbX0nK4z4JDM X-Spamd-Bar: ----- X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N Adam Weinberger writes: > > > Ohhhh, so it's about loading *third-party* modules as shared libs? Yup > > (Looping in maintainer here) If the previous statement is correct, would > you be okay with me updating DYNLIB_DESC to reflect that? As it's currently > written it looks like turning it off would create a fully statically-linked > sbin/unbound, which is not the case. That is fine with me, jaap