From nobody Sun Dec 24 21:38:58 2023
X-Original-To: dev-commits-ports-main@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1])
by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4SyvYm4pBVz54XgM;
Sun, 24 Dec 2023 21:39:08 +0000 (UTC)
(envelope-from mi+t@virtual-estates.net)
Received: from symbion.zaytman.com (symbion.zaytman.com [64.112.176.10])
(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256
client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256)
(Client CN "symbion", Issuer "Narawntapu" (not verified))
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4SyvYm49bzz3S4j;
Sun, 24 Dec 2023 21:39:08 +0000 (UTC)
(envelope-from mi+t@virtual-estates.net)
Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org;
none
Received: from aldan.narawntapu (pool-100-1-252-187.nwrknj.fios.verizon.net [100.1.252.187])
by symbion.zaytman.com (8.17.1/8.16.1) with ESMTPS id 3BOLd1WX044571
(version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK);
Sun, 24 Dec 2023 16:39:01 -0500 (EST)
(envelope-from mi+t@virtual-estates.net)
X-Authentication-Warning: symbion.zaytman.com: Host pool-100-1-252-187.nwrknj.fios.verizon.net [100.1.252.187] claimed to be aldan.narawntapu
Received: from [192.168.1.10] (aldan [192.168.1.10])
by aldan.narawntapu (8.17.2/8.17.1) with ESMTP id 3BOLcwdL096071;
Sun, 24 Dec 2023 16:38:59 -0500 (EST)
(envelope-from mi+t@virtual-estates.net)
X-Authentication-Warning: aldan.narawntapu: Host aldan [192.168.1.10] claimed to be [192.168.1.10]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="------------11rPJi26WIvqEZ0XUFj8rLC9"
Message-ID: <22e32001-b097-47d8-8866-083727424152@virtual-estates.net>
Date: Sun, 24 Dec 2023 16:38:58 -0500
List-Id: Commits to the main branch of the FreeBSD ports repository TEST_TARGET identifies the make-target in the upstream's
Makefile, does not it? Not in the port's Makefile, which, as you
can see upon closer examination, is different... The problem with the upstream's test-target is that it always
succeeds -- even if a test fails. So I have a little awk-script,
which parses the results.
Porter Handbook suggests defining TEST_TARGET:
I don't see, where that text prohibits -- or even discourages --
what I am doing. Do you?https://docs.freebsd.org/en/books/porters-handbook/book/#make-test
-mi--------------11rPJi26WIvqEZ0XUFj8rLC9--