From nobody Mon Oct 31 00:33:57 2022 X-Original-To: dev-commits-ports-main@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4N0vKN6YFCz4h3Dr; Mon, 31 Oct 2022 00:34:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yuri@freebsd.org) Received: from shell1.rawbw.com (shell1.rawbw.com [198.144.192.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4N0vKN5LRpz3Kk8; Mon, 31 Oct 2022 00:34:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yuri@freebsd.org) Received: from [192.168.5.3] (c-73-93-225-239.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [73.93.225.239]) (authenticated bits=0) by shell1.rawbw.com (8.15.1/8.15.1) with ESMTPSA id 29V0Xx77061465 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Sun, 30 Oct 2022 17:33:59 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from yuri@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: shell1.rawbw.com: Host c-73-93-225-239.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [73.93.225.239] claimed to be [192.168.5.3] Message-ID: <5c567eb4-0b63-faac-0a93-160c2aedd1f3@tsoft.com> Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2022 17:33:57 -0700 List-Id: Commits to the main branch of the FreeBSD ports repository List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/dev-commits-ports-main List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-dev-commits-ports-main@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: dev-commits-ports-main@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.4.0 Subject: Re: git: b095fb085850 - main - security/amavisd-new: Use USE_GITLAB Content-Language: en-US To: Daniel Engberg Cc: ports-committers@freebsd.org, dev-commits-ports-all@freebsd.org, dev-commits-ports-main@freebsd.org, Thierry References: <202210302006.29UK6a96011531@gitrepo.freebsd.org> <47d5123e-f2a0-be5b-020f-4f4c28e1d1c5@tsoft.com> From: Yuri In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4N0vKN5LRpz3Kk8 X-Rspamd-Pre-Result: action=no action; module=replies; Message is reply to one we originated X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[] X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N On 10/30/22 16:51, Daniel Engberg wrote: > It's in the works and we preferably want to align the very few ports > left that doesn't already use USE_GITLAB for consistency > and upcoming exp-run. I've shared more details in PR 267104 about it. Why are you making changes proactively for potential future improvements? Doesn't it make more sense to make such changes after these improvements are implemented, so that there is no loss of functionality in the meantime? Future improvements can take a very long time to land, and loss of functionality is immediate. Yuri