From nobody Tue May 03 16:44:09 2022 X-Original-To: dev-commits-ports-main@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF6451ABD3E8; Tue, 3 May 2022 16:44:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from manu@bidouilliste.com) Received: from mx.blih.net (mx.blih.net [212.83.155.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mx.blih.net", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Kt5QN0mKLz4qF1; Tue, 3 May 2022 16:44:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from manu@bidouilliste.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bidouilliste.com; s=mx; t=1651596250; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=wvoUNHb+/i78JYvt7EVlDvOubU2NlnboDGNsSxfoiZw=; b=O2ibl7XNOTtjI38etfMPhs/G401Ik8isjiMpdNZ10y3Ai2rzC+zTIO27WWfqvBtUt49mVN oeVkRXFfGH892ybK2WLifupAv/ZqVk7bztZrJJcu1n3LAgoAQWRjM/l9dTdEY0D30rTfKP JbLVBjwY/mwQi8uvjEgGBqMXNMzttHs= Received: from skull.home.blih.net (lfbn-idf2-1-1209-45.w90-92.abo.wanadoo.fr [90.92.34.45]) by mx.blih.net (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 2c3a60b8 (TLSv1.3:TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256:NO); Tue, 3 May 2022 16:44:10 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 3 May 2022 18:44:09 +0200 From: Emmanuel Vadot To: Christoph Moench-Tegeder Cc: Joseph Mingrone , Jan Beich , Craig Leres , Christoph Moench-Tegeder , ports-committers@freebsd.org, dev-commits-ports-all@freebsd.org, dev-commits-ports-main@freebsd.org Subject: Re: git: 980444a82fbd - main - www/firefox: update to 100.0 (rc2) Message-Id: <20220503184409.c641da3a1dedd707601432bb@bidouilliste.com> In-Reply-To: References: <05c2a241-5d32-24d9-c223-66aa9ca99b75@freebsd.org> <76d4fb65-b1df-2941-cc06-5ab23607a233@freebsd.org> <20220503094616.ad8309626972ab0c7d6c1cd9@bidouilliste.com> <4k26-hkiv-wny@FreeBSD.org> <86y1ziab1f.fsf@phe.ftfl.ca> <20220503175240.89a47079840b06ce1a6cc22a@bidouilliste.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.7.0 (GTK+ 2.24.33; amd64-portbld-freebsd14.0) List-Id: Commits to the main branch of the FreeBSD ports repository List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/dev-commits-ports-main List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-dev-commits-ports-main@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: dev-commits-ports-main@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Kt5QN0mKLz4qF1 X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[] X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N On Tue, 3 May 2022 18:42:52 +0200 Christoph Moench-Tegeder wrote: > ## Emmanuel Vadot (manu@bidouilliste.com): >=20 > > That's good for now thanks but what about the futur ? > > Should we allow to have LTO turn on on port that uses both LLVM and > > Rust ? Because otherwise it will happen again when a new rust version > > if released and the llvm version isn't the same. >=20 > For this part: I'd rather leave LTO=3Doff for good. > I did never test it, and I won't: I feel like I'm already spending more > time on building gecko ports than on using them, so LTO is a net negative > for me, it doubles the build time and saves a whopping 300kB on package > size. Whoever wants to play with LTO, fine, but if it breaks both parts > are yours to keep. >=20 > Gru=DF, > Christoph >=20 > --=20 > Spare Space That's fine with me. Thanks a lot. --=20 Emmanuel Vadot