From nobody Mon Mar 21 18:42:12 2022 X-Original-To: dev-commits-ports-main@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E489B1A180D8; Mon, 21 Mar 2022 18:42:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pi@freebsd.org) Received: from fc.opsec.eu (fc.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200:4::4]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4KMk4R29Qqz3nTP; Mon, 21 Mar 2022 18:42:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pi@freebsd.org) Received: from pi by fc.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.95 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1nWMyq-0003QS-Ol; Mon, 21 Mar 2022 19:42:12 +0100 Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2022 19:42:12 +0100 From: Kurt Jaeger To: Mark Johnston Cc: Thomas Zander , Rene Ladan , Matthias Fechner , Christoph Moench-Tegeder , Bernard Spil , "ports-committers@FreeBSD.org" , dev-commits-ports-all@freebsd.org, dev-commits-ports-main@freebsd.org, secteam@freebsd.org Subject: Re: git: 43741377b143 - main - security/openssl: Security update to 1.1.1n Message-ID: References: <579f562b-8add-d3f7-77c9-1a6126bd282b@FreeBSD.org> List-Id: Commits to the main branch of the FreeBSD ports repository List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/dev-commits-ports-main List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-dev-commits-ports-main@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: dev-commits-ports-main@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4KMk4R29Qqz3nTP X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=softfail (mx1.freebsd.org: 2001:14f8:200:4::4 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of pi@freebsd.org) smtp.mailfrom=pi@freebsd.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-0.88 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; TO_DN_EQ_ADDR_SOME(0.00)[]; FREEFALL_USER(0.00)[pi]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.81)[-0.810]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.87)[-0.872]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[freebsd.org]; R_SPF_SOFTFAIL(0.00)[~all:c]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.90)[0.898]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_SEVEN(0.00)[10]; MLMMJ_DEST(0.00)[dev-commits-ports-all,dev-commits-ports-main]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:12502, ipnet:2001:14f8::/32, country:DE]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N Hi! > We can simply push a -p9 which reverts EN-22:10 and :11, but of course > it would be preferable to precisely identify the problem. We upgraded a production box from 12.2p11 directly to 13.0p8 and are now unsure if we might have trouble. We do not build ports on that box, but still... So we're somehow between a rock and a hard place and would appreciate if some p9 would be provided that rolls back the two zfs fixes. Is someone working on that ? Rolling back to 12.2 would not work because we upgraded the zpool. freebsd-upgrade down to 13.0p7 does not work. There's an old PR that suggests a patch to provide that feature, at: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226893 Another EN to fix NFS like the patch mentioned on https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=256280 would be highly appreciated as well... I have no idea how much work the rollout of a EN is, what work would need to be done and who would be in charge of that task, so I can not ask for someone to do that work. If someone can shed some light on this process for an EN, I would appreciate it. -- pi@FreeBSD.org +49 171 3101372 Now what ?