Re: git: 43741377b143 - main - security/openssl: Security update to 1.1.1n
- Reply: Thomas Zander : "Re: git: 43741377b143 - main - security/openssl: Security update to 1.1.1n"
- Reply: Rene Ladan : "Re: git: 43741377b143 - main - security/openssl: Security update to 1.1.1n"
- Reply: Matthias Fechner : "Re: git: 43741377b143 - main - security/openssl: Security update to 1.1.1n"
- Reply: Matthias Fechner : "Re: git: 43741377b143 - main - security/openssl: Security update to 1.1.1n"
- Reply: Kurt Jaeger : "Re: git: 43741377b143 - main - security/openssl: Security update to 1.1.1n"
- In reply to: Thomas Zander : "Re: git: 43741377b143 - main - security/openssl: Security update to 1.1.1n"
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2022 16:42:59 UTC
On Sat, Mar 19, 2022 at 12:40:45PM +0100, Thomas Zander wrote: > On Sat, 19 Mar 2022 at 12:11, Rene Ladan <rene@freebsd.org> wrote: > > > > On Sat, Mar 19, 2022 at 11:04:58AM +0100, Thomas Zander wrote: > > > On Sat, 19 Mar 2022 at 09:00, Matthias Fechner <mfechner@freebsd.org> wrote: > > > > > > > I can confirm now, the problem is definitely related to the -p8 update. > > > > I rolled back now to -p7 using `freebsd-update rollback`. > > > > [...] > > > > System is now up and running again. > > > > This all works even if poudriere jail is using -p8. No need to downgrade the jail/base version poudriere is using. > > > > It is caused by the kernel so the ZFS patch seems to be broken and -p8 should maybe not rolled out to not break more systems of users. > > > > > > On top of "stop rollout", there is the question how to identify the > > > broken files for the users who have already upgraded to -p8. A `zpool > > > scrub` presumably won't help. > > > > I think it also applies to 13.1-BETA2 ? > > > > Should we involve/CC some src committers? > > I have just rolled back to -p7 and run a number of test builds in > poudriere (the jails still have the -p8 user land). I see the same as > Matthias and Christoph, the rollback to the -p7 kernel/zfs resolved > the build problems, there are no NUL byte files generated anymore. > Adding markj@ to the discussion. Mark, the TLDR so far: > - One of the zfs patches in -p8 seems to cause erroneous writes. > - We noticed because of many build failures with poudriere (presumably > highly io-loaded during build). > - Symptom: Production of files with large runs of NUL-bytes. I've had zero luck reproducing this locally. I built several hundred ports, including textproc/py-pystemmer mentioned elsewhere in the thread, without any failures or instances of zero-filled files. Another member of secteam also hasn't been able to trigger any build failures on -p8. Any hints on a reproducer would be useful. We can simply push a -p9 which reverts EN-22:10 and :11, but of course it would be preferable to precisely identify the problem.