From nobody Mon Dec 12 09:27:36 2022 X-Original-To: dev-commits-ports-main@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4NVx9h3R80z4jhr1; Mon, 12 Dec 2022 09:27:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danfe@freebsd.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:6074::16:84]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "freefall.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4NVx9h2tbZz3rrt; Mon, 12 Dec 2022 09:27:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danfe@freebsd.org) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1670837256; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=y7J4+g9VQbilf6xCEf6e0voOZ05QPSJJCbaKf+RHeA0=; b=e6/6cLZwp5NL+QJhSOyAzn2VjnJhQiMUiDAfZDPXrAWj4RoXp6CiZkZuuYxPWFkTfeelth qo/BvBYsJZcfg7agVfQ0infiV2x75McPZ/k684LQQKfw6WQ/x9f+w/qnVo7EjV7UsU14lR h1K/8RX9XAILX9aUeXXCZObDIsTPi9b6M9k55z6EPgF+rxTd6MxET7h9D4e/ONhm3TCsU4 RrsnpRnc6A5/YdyM6LpAdysfwyQDu6zbMP4Tpf3Aw4AO16DoTW/rrKfhg1B5HAZqVAeOBg zR76keBX6moPG/w2VQcCoGSzG/SBTiR0zfqimv8jSyZgfuoK1X5FF1nKw507uQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1670837256; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=y7J4+g9VQbilf6xCEf6e0voOZ05QPSJJCbaKf+RHeA0=; b=QaHXiSiIYv/uiX8AG0W0agIY3rPkAISzV074GR1HGTZ3XOg3QIyFeq5p04yobHuydkR6wf zRmcrN3fQ7otNkg6TgWNWMggoUSTMOi71ZvTPKxh5j1GnCR1z9Cq3SCGdgjnjuiol0gGYZ AcZNQiUoLvyaualfWvFgBtTm3pHJOqM6fP5fNZ2k40X047nYkmDkjtyc/c8YWKeoLdD88g QTHwo8R3jNH9rVjO+RZV1CXqZNt0ktK+ANU37qJ+ot97fwPSJCPo0ABpJ00+tMYm+sZNg/ kIeTvaQE2H8fySrDaYKUzjWdjKhFDOchfPcyOXi0Pvmn0llSEIJiFwJTrA0J+Q== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx1.freebsd.org; none ARC-Seal: i=1; s=dkim; d=freebsd.org; t=1670837256; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=yjHKdGjlLpV/5QjUxGGpszsxg+L8vnP++G+Gcj0AeaJ7vpKOFNQ/FU1SYcpdpKuSUKdJ8l pyij3C4UKimf87uMtmEUXUdbuUfLiKvYPXsMEECifsTxIMOnVz+u9xFC85A7mVuvjDgGMD macKgP8CJWbYoA7ZkndWSSxcpG7xpiJMy5x1waOQHEBc6Z4KqGPMJt3o3Mzlz2SexZXuAI 8xjmbMcaq6nCGX2S57eAd1qSoMBT2AMB5rM+RDvu+hhVN7Q/zh6Yi6VEheZPF0nBZnVXQa P+iU27dmzQA8/IOggBPepX4o02Ek0tYostJjsWt3uKz0Hyp2az+cnpWJsWCV8g== Received: by freefall.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1033) id 3651C2A14; Mon, 12 Dec 2022 09:27:36 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2022 09:27:36 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev To: Jan Beich Cc: ports-committers@freebsd.org, dev-commits-ports-all@freebsd.org, dev-commits-ports-main@freebsd.org Subject: Re: git: d008ed9fc471 - main - editors/bless: resurrect^Wreadd previously expired port Message-ID: References: <202212010944.2B19iKex079308@gitrepo.freebsd.org> <8rje-ns1a-wny@FreeBSD.org> List-Id: Commits to the main branch of the FreeBSD ports repository List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/dev-commits-ports-main List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-dev-commits-ports-main@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: dev-commits-ports-main@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N On Sun, Dec 11, 2022 at 08:52:51PM +0100, Jan Beich wrote: > Jan Beich writes: > > Alexey Dokuchaev writes: > >> +++ b/editors/bless/Makefile > >> @@ -0,0 +1,33 @@ > >> +PORTNAME= bless > >> +PORTVERSION= 0.6.3 > >> +DISTVERSIONPREFIX= v > >> +CATEGORIES= editors > > > > What happened to PORTEPOCH added in 1cdc1ee0cb04 ? ports@ list is now > > spammed about version going backwards. > > > >> +MAINTAINER= mono@FreeBSD.org > > > > Without their approval? A leaf port, not part of upstream Mono project. > > mono@ may have maintained it in the past but the team roster and priorities > > likely have changed after ~7 years the port was removed. > > > > Not being a maintainer means you'll miss out on any notifications about > > the port like the above PORTEPOCH regression. > > Apologies. I've compromised my point with loaded wording. Consider it as > rant and ignore. There's nothing wrong with your reply. I've indeed overlooked the PORTEPOCH when restoring the port (albeit not sure how useful it is now as the port had been gone for nearly seven years). Feel free to add it back as I can't commit at the moment. As for maintainer, I've simply restored the old (previous) one; I would've taken it if it was ports@, but as I'd be probably interacting closer with Mono/.Net platform under FreeBSD, it should be fine for now. ./danfe