From nobody Thu Aug 25 14:05:25 2022 X-Original-To: dev-commits-ports-main@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4MD4Vb2XHKz4Zdbg; Thu, 25 Aug 2022 14:05:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bapt@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.freebsd.org (smtp.freebsd.org [96.47.72.83]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4MD4Vb1yNZz4GL4; Thu, 25 Aug 2022 14:05:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bapt@FreeBSD.org) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1661436327; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=ZlHloM/QsZfYRNIaeRvmwMPjKcXns6XscnwVxHKHeFU=; b=g/09UZ/9MUmU2YHtn8nrBmK3mlBmX9MmafQ/R3c/4IEkLh8fiDbttHSgdPRt5r7osLBpVX LpA1B84JEhKI3a6KcR37dpA/7rKyMtyIjXN0ZE9qmrQa0QP7OwcUlgTvI+yYGkO/afGBhf DXwUw0TU1dVLaaRQmFJPCPuKpgPA+j6D5FeHEoB+z9Czqtt9R3XNhxSJXn3NEbTlkPmua3 sQLMQdzlbAOmpe0efbrZlVYdLcaaxtrsGn2ywy4KCXERgICb4RuWof6C1cTVWhImTpCPG4 ZaVi1GRfTD6vBxhmX+5D5MdldbCdvcIEahj8fmNp5XfQhMb5kA1sshHmelk2ww== Received: from aniel.nours.eu (nours.eu [176.31.115.77]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: bapt) by smtp.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4MD4Vb099xzjS1; Thu, 25 Aug 2022 14:05:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bapt@FreeBSD.org) Received: by aniel.nours.eu (Postfix, from userid 1001) id D500D12C2FB; Thu, 25 Aug 2022 16:05:25 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2022 16:05:25 +0200 From: Baptiste Daroussin To: Piotr Kubaj Cc: ports-committers@FreeBSD.org, dev-commits-ports-all@FreeBSD.org, dev-commits-ports-main@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: git: 8ecb1f814114 - main - Revert "lang/rust: Update to 1.63.0" Message-ID: <20220825140525.qmpzqk7xcob3mtha@aniel.nours.eu> References: <202208251050.27PAoUmi075877@gitrepo.freebsd.org> <20220825120826.couaapv3odwpjilf@aniel.nours.eu> <20220825132412.vr2vvkxejnqefzq2@aniel.nours.eu> List-Id: Commits to the main branch of the FreeBSD ports repository List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/dev-commits-ports-main List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-dev-commits-ports-main@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: dev-commits-ports-main@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1661436327; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=ZlHloM/QsZfYRNIaeRvmwMPjKcXns6XscnwVxHKHeFU=; b=Cpp1G+oC9v5UYVvTzZthQ2YdA7MwmsummSbUbHykvXBCrogaScgd8lJYbdfUfo/olMCLb5 IRbARe7EALMNN+k2Xsmh30BeeThZ/KlBNSJHtxwGNS8z0MlZYNtCdwMbNimsmZoW0NGsms 2KcqXzS8j6dM4mI/yN9WkFXQD1Jr357ahdnjRsvnE26Rlt15k+tLv4dQUrH4/Ku35wkLoe po4gE7FLVIePG0CekUDVYEXVhmCdAplM+qyMUW+z6yRHyilo3J2NE1/r5m6jdGOwHYu7OZ vh11BVnWLf9LP40eoI0FBzR1UcE2ZVAb0vcEAwjtVRSmGLymgo+om0MGN6kxnA== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=dkim; d=freebsd.org; t=1661436327; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=oG9TKpbbJmEK9PcjFAD7c9qdZKR7Qc5h5eD5DGESsucdYnbkBoQz54hHrdU+VOhJ1WgxxI RxCXIEDJ1Utmsvb+jRJfjj/mk46srhcWFAL36oqYZnrwvcCW60PY/zKDKRmm366TajtRzL dhBBc9dsqUbCWfhx/eTfCoEz1LtSjk0Jf1Bb2R86tF3eC/9LzLq5qwxkJ2n7oh3A2cK5oV IKmWfOY3iddeJsmW37FSmGY0r343sLRIprqcsykVuK1KSzgACnqh/w4n2R6Hoj+N7zHxzz hqshxrXdBbsGHd8BVJBELp2mgtZaIKWhcEsjqyQzceHPrPaLmPLJF0O51KNYDA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx1.freebsd.org; none X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N On Thu, Aug 25, 2022 at 03:42:09PM +0200, Piotr Kubaj wrote: > On 22-08-25 15:24:12, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 25, 2022 at 02:21:28PM +0200, Piotr Kubaj wrote: > > > On 22-08-25 14:08:26, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > > > > On Thu, Aug 25, 2022 at 10:50:30AM +0000, Piotr Kubaj wrote: > > > > > The branch main has been updated by pkubaj: > > > > > > > > > > URL: https://cgit.FreeBSD.org/ports/commit/?id=8ecb1f8141144c1603eb4026122d2e60eeaccd64 > > > > > > > > > > commit 8ecb1f8141144c1603eb4026122d2e60eeaccd64 > > > > > Author: Piotr Kubaj > > > > > AuthorDate: 2022-08-25 10:29:24 +0000 > > > > > Commit: Piotr Kubaj > > > > > CommitDate: 2022-08-25 10:49:36 +0000 > > > > > > > > > > Revert "lang/rust: Update to 1.63.0" > > > > > > > > > > This reverts commit f36cc819accadae1fefc14c203e5fbe9c74e1492. > > > > > > > > > > I asked for an exp-run for powerpc and powerpc64 on a recently provided > > > > > cluster machine but got no reply. > > > > > > > > > > PR: 265915 > > > > > > > > You cannot take the decision to revert on your own for many reasons: > > > > > > > > 1. etiquete: we ask people to actually revert if needed and escalate if they > > > > don't, we never revert directly ourself! the only one allowed to do "rude" revert > > > > are people taking care of the package building when something break the delivery > > > > of packages for Tier 1 > > > I did it myself so that users don't upgrade in the meantime, since that > > > would create further confusion. If I let it wait, then PORTEPOCH should > > > have been bumped for all the affected ports, which I think we all agree > > > would be troublesome. > > > > No what will happen is given it works on Tier1, the Tier2 will fix one by one > > the issues that raised if any without reverting, meaning no PORTEPOCH would be > > needed. > > Isn't it better to fix issues BEFORE committing? > > > > > > > > > > > > 2. an exp-run happened and was granted by portmgr, exp-run are costly we cannot > > > > expect exp-runs for non tier 1 architecture for every changes (beside the fact > > > > :x > > > > > > I do not ask for exp-runs "for every change". In fact, this was the 1st > > > time I asked for an exp-run on powerpc*. > > > > > > If you can't expect exp-runs on non-Tier 1, why do we have powerpc* > > > exp-run machines? > > > > We do not have those machine functionnal! so we cannot do those exp-run, and > > even if we had, it will be at the discression of the people doing the exp-run to > > see if they have the resources or not to add an extra target for exp-run. > The attached email says the contrary. I can see your level of trust here in what I am saying, I am part of both portmgr and clusteradm, so if I say portmgr do not have powerpc machines available for exp-run, you can be sure that I double checked. > > > > > > > This also wouldn't have happened if antoine@ had explained earlier he's > > > not able to do exp-runs on powerpc*. > > > > While I agree that antoine should have answered (maybe he missed the messages) > > it does not mean that you are allowed to make a driven by revert. > > > > > > > > > > > 3. powerpc* is not yet a Tier 1 so there is no promise on the delivery of > > > > packages. > > > > > > Yes, but everyone can still build from ports. > > > > yes but again this is tier 2! same lack of warrant > If you talk about "warranty", is there a "warranty" that all the ports > build on Tier 1? > > Warranty implies some paid support and compensation when things don't > work. So there's actually no warranty, we are not RHEL. Common you perfectly know what it means! Bapt