Re: git: cc1694740e8d - main - devel/binutils: Reset MAINTAINER
- Reply: Alexey Dokuchaev : "Re: git: cc1694740e8d - main - devel/binutils: Reset MAINTAINER"
- Reply: Fernando_Apesteguía : "Re: git: cc1694740e8d - main - devel/binutils: Reset MAINTAINER"
- In reply to: Fernando Apesteguía : "git: cc1694740e8d - main - devel/binutils: Reset MAINTAINER"
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2022 17:56:15 UTC
In message <202208171625.27HGPI6L098043@gitrepo.freebsd.org>, =?utf-8?Q?Fernand o=20Apestegu=C3=ADa?= writes: > The branch main has been updated by fernape: > > URL: https://cgit.FreeBSD.org/ports/commit/?id=cc1694740e8d5725176d9bd94e96f1 > a8e7d11219 > > commit cc1694740e8d5725176d9bd94e96f1a8e7d11219 > Author: Fernando Apesteguía <fernape@FreeBSD.org> > AuthorDate: 2022-08-17 05:37:43 +0000 > Commit: Fernando Apesteguía <fernape@FreeBSD.org> > CommitDate: 2022-08-17 16:21:59 +0000 > > devel/binutils: Reset MAINTAINER > > Maintainer has not been responsive since he took maintainership of the po > rt. > Reset MAINTAINER to reflect the real status of the port. Ideally, when people request the maintainership of a port, they should also submit patches for said port. IIRC, it used to be this way years ago. I'm not sure when this unwritten rule changed. I've updated the port from 2.37 to 2.39 and will commit it shortly, assuming there are no plist issues. -- Cheers, Cy Schubert <Cy.Schubert@cschubert.com> FreeBSD UNIX: <cy@FreeBSD.org> Web: http://www.FreeBSD.org NTP: <cy@nwtime.org> Web: https://nwtime.org e**(i*pi)+1=0