From nobody Wed Aug 03 07:55:36 2022 X-Original-To: dev-commits-ports-main@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4LyPL84Fkcz4XqyR; Wed, 3 Aug 2022 07:55:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from manu@bidouilliste.com) Received: from mx.blih.net (mx.blih.net [212.83.155.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mx.blih.net", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4LyPL6581Mz45cR; Wed, 3 Aug 2022 07:55:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from manu@bidouilliste.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bidouilliste.com; s=mx; t=1659513340; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=j8yf5IhIQRkjoHu0SuzmSVde9Za99IiwbzYHb0lwEJQ=; b=PGQeUj/yqgmqMn+SDfbyZkGtDJRhkJ7i76mNHxYgJqztBlZNoIj66Dr2P6/cr5WL0Jwcc1 SGawg/i2OT8J+lxzLo8ndfvOO0W05tOlPEOCarNQj/lMMoY+HX7JY1aueZicQuo6RTUFLL vucA1Af0q7AzD/L8Sa+vFVkOhuQbP+c= Received: from skull.home.blih.net (static-176-182-91-185.ncc.abo.bbox.fr [176.182.91.185]) by mx.blih.net (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 9c841fc9 (TLSv1.3:TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256:NO); Wed, 3 Aug 2022 07:55:39 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2022 09:55:36 +0200 From: Emmanuel Vadot To: Stefan Esser Cc: Emmanuel Vadot , ports-committers@FreeBSD.org, dev-commits-ports-all@FreeBSD.org, dev-commits-ports-main@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: git: d540ef54663a - main - graphics/drm-54-kmod: Marked as ignore for FreeBSD HEAD Message-Id: <20220803095536.57adf64bd1d25cf0a647d692@bidouilliste.com> In-Reply-To: <27a4454b-e1a3-d025-6a8c-55c45fac7307@FreeBSD.org> References: <202208021536.272Favjp083685@gitrepo.freebsd.org> <49fe8d87-33ab-612a-7da1-a83ea4d7ffe8@FreeBSD.org> <20220802180828.c49cf690d956d8fdce42cbd0@bidouilliste.com> <27a4454b-e1a3-d025-6a8c-55c45fac7307@FreeBSD.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.7.0 (GTK+ 2.24.33; amd64-portbld-freebsd14.0) List-Id: Commits to the main branch of the FreeBSD ports repository List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/dev-commits-ports-main List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-dev-commits-ports-main@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: dev-commits-ports-main@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4LyPL6581Mz45cR X-Spamd-Bar: --- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=bidouilliste.com header.s=mx header.b="PGQeUj/y"; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=bidouilliste.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of manu@bidouilliste.com designates 212.83.155.74 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=manu@bidouilliste.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.50 / 15.00]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-1.000]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[bidouilliste.com,none]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[bidouilliste.com:s=mx]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:212.83.155.74/32]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MLMMJ_DEST(0.00)[dev-commits-ports-all@FreeBSD.org,dev-commits-ports-main@FreeBSD.org]; ASN(0.00)[asn:12876, ipnet:212.83.128.0/19, country:FR]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_FIVE(0.00)[5]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; FREEFALL_USER(0.00)[manu]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[bidouilliste.com:+]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[] X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N On Tue, 2 Aug 2022 20:38:08 +0200 Stefan Esser wrote: > Am 02.08.22 um 18:08 schrieb Emmanuel Vadot: > > On Tue, 2 Aug 2022 17:59:04 +0200 > > Stefan Esser wrote: > > > >> Am 02.08.22 um 17:36 schrieb Emmanuel Vadot: > [...] > >>> graphics/drm-54-kmod: Marked as ignore for FreeBSD HEAD > >>> > >>> Everyone should use graphics/drm-510-kmod on Current. > >>> > >>> Sponsored by: Beckhoff Automation GmbH & Co. KG > >> > >> Yes, everybody should use drm-510-kmod on HEAD, too bad that > >> it still does not work with AMD GPUs: > >> > >> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=262043 > >> > >> Please revert until version 5.10 works for all relevant GPUs! > >> > >> Regards, STefan > > > > It doesn't not work with *your* amdgpu, works perfectly fine here on > > multiple amdgpu. > > Do you have an AMD GPU that works with 5.10? As said above yes. > When I opened the PR, I got a number of me-too replies I don't see how this could have helped me that you had some me-too replies in private ... > I'm definitely not the only one affected. > I do assume that other -CURRENT users with > AMD graphics cards continue to use drm-54-kmod (as I do). Do not assume, I assumed that everyone on current was using 510 (as it's the default version in graphics/drm-kmod) and it looked like I was wrong. > There is no reason to make drm-54-kmod fail on -CURRENT for those users > that still cannot use drm-510-kmod. I'll be pushing some linuxkpi code that will make 5.4 fail to compile in a few days and I really don't have the manpower to keep 2 branches (3 if you count master) alive. > When the package is no longer built > on -CURRENT, "pkg upgrade" will just remove drm-54-kmod on -CURRENT > systems when it is no longer provided by the package mirrors. > I'd consider that a violation of POLA, especially since drm-54-kmod > continues to work just fine on -CURRENT and continues to be supported > on -STABLE. > > > Please open a bug on github.com/freebsd/drm-kmod with all the info > > asked so I can see if I can help more. > > I have opened a FreeBSD PR with all the information I have, back in > February, and you have known about it. On 2022-02-19 you added a > comment to this PR where you state that you have no AMD GPU to test > the DRM code with). No, I said that I didn't had any GPU that uses the i2c bitbang code. > I'll open an issue on GitHub with the same information, but I consider > the FreeBSD PR the correct place to report issues that affect FreeBSD. > > Regards, STefan > > PS: https://github.com/freebsd/drm-kmod/issues/195 -- Emmanuel Vadot