From nobody Wed Nov 17 16:18:49 2021 X-Original-To: dev-commits-ports-main@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 096C51897996; Wed, 17 Nov 2021 16:18:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mpp302@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ed1-f51.google.com (mail-ed1-f51.google.com [209.85.208.51]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1D4" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4HvSm94vxJz3v9V; Wed, 17 Nov 2021 16:18:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mpp302@gmail.com) Received: by mail-ed1-f51.google.com with SMTP id z5so13618906edd.3; Wed, 17 Nov 2021 08:18:49 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:mime-version:user-agent :content-language:to:cc:references:from:subject:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=FA9CYN3TSkhxEW1NrLIpR20rtebcCL3uA/vkAkatYFw=; b=TFzjbdw8paw1Lxe5hpmYbC5BBz1Es1fGBns58qxgWpT2AVFR282Sc4Gqgkb+7TlZhc Z1i4MlYa3oNHpTZgFwZw4IdsOESrVs4isXb7Q6zLzZScgGtB1Up65cU5Msk9B0Pi3ZnD UPepqMB6hR7XYhfp7rHB/AOh6jmr+W8SZ/UTBYGdoNPwBSsKBvoBwUw8XSrgHrG0cp0H Gh4r7ELAjIfuEV2iZLcBjzufLXDXvCFw4C80cvqzyFHsWivFpo+2GgRv6QCGCWwwONAI UxOPyrCOvS/g41evYlSES+E81X4Ic+P9GhcP0fzF5J9vz+mLeBtwoZCK5TC6v2CfEl2P D7EA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530rk+4lMPqv1Ckzw9PlIxcNLmELH3q1o8VbO1RueSrrbqxkQjIf Lt7tUEbnh6dqSzM7b06cr1o2/G5HMqQ= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwwhMvlLtWcxLneIRrk/8Q7xNd40dokE6NFO1Z7EkoavWG3SpnRwIWmpb8daxA3NLEfelWBcA== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:42cf:: with SMTP id i15mr24951485edc.82.1637165928524; Wed, 17 Nov 2021 08:18:48 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.0.194] (ip5f5bd4f7.dynamic.kabel-deutschland.de. [95.91.212.247]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id w3sm114794edj.63.2021.11.17.08.18.47 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 17 Nov 2021 08:18:47 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <9a08aec3-468e-cd50-c326-1decb1920b38@FreeBSD.org> Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2021 17:18:49 +0100 List-Id: Commits to the main branch of the FreeBSD ports repository List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/dev-commits-ports-main List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-dev-commits-ports-main@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: dev-commits-ports-main@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.3.0 Content-Language: en-US To: Guangyuan Yang Cc: ports-committers , dev-commits-ports-all@freebsd.org, dev-commits-ports-main@freebsd.org References: <202111162156.1AGLuv0P058897@gitrepo.freebsd.org> <7130c8b4-fed4-7e7e-cf5d-4ece5c82fc2e@FreeBSD.org> From: Mateusz Piotrowski <0mp@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: git: 692cca400331 - main - www/grafana: Mark DEPRECATED and set expiration date In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4HvSm94vxJz3v9V X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[] X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N On 17/11/2021 06:21, Guangyuan Yang wrote: > Mateusz Piotrowski <0mp@freebsd.org> 于2021年11月16日周二 下午5:15写道： >> On 16/11/2021 22:56, Guangyuan Yang wrote: >>> commit 692cca4003317a6c83fa226feccab3e5ec47ab52 ... >>> www/grafana: Mark DEPRECATED and set expiration date >>> >>> Grafana 1 is no longer maintained upstream years ago. Mark DEPRECATED >>> after the next quarterly cycle. >>> >>> PR: 257763 >>> Approved by: robak (maintainer, timeout > 3 months) >> Are there any technical reasons why we shouldn't update www/grafana to provide the most recent >> Grafana version? > I have actually raised this option as well in the PR (257763), but > after months of maintainer timeout, I just decided to take the easier > route. I think www/grafana tracking the latest Grafana version is a > good idea, but the implementation can be a new slave port tracking > www/grafana8, or ideally have the same maintainer of www/grafana8. I > currently do not have extra cycles for it though, so the first thing > is to stop the confusion that www/grafana currently causes. Thank you for the explanation. I guess that this project then is up grabs.