Re: git: 020281bef16d - main - archivers/fastjar: remove undue deprecation of maintained port
- Reply: Fernando_Apesteguía : "Re: git: 020281bef16d - main - archivers/fastjar: remove undue deprecation of maintained port"
- In reply to: Gleb Popov : "Re: git: 020281bef16d - main - archivers/fastjar: remove undue deprecation of maintained port"
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Sat, 30 Mar 2024 13:21:26 UTC
On 2024-03-30T09:06:51.000+01:00, Gleb Popov <arrowd@freebsd.org> wrote: > On Sat, Mar 30, 2024 at 8:38 AM Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@freebsd.org> wrote: > > > > > The branch main has been updated by danfe: > > > > URL: https://cgit.FreeBSD.org/ports/commit/?id=020281bef16d866a64bac35850f21ae27f956b5c > > > > commit 020281bef16d866a64bac35850f21ae27f956b5c > > Author: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org> > > AuthorDate: 2024-03-30 05:36:18 +0000 > > Commit: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org> > > CommitDate: 2024-03-30 05:36:18 +0000 > > > > archivers/fastjar: remove undue deprecation of maintained port > > It is my personal opinion, but I think that one should assume > maintainership when undeprecating a port (especially maintained by a group) I also found an old CVE which I don't know if it's fixed or not. https://www.opencve.io/cve/CVE-2006-3619 There's also a fork here from what I can tell: http://download.savannah.nongnu.org/releases/fastjar/ I don't know if it's worth keeping for less than a sec of processing and newer version of openjdk might have improved performance too (openjdk8 is pretty old). Best regards, Daniel