Re: git: d22f15315b93 - main - devel/gmake43: Corrections
- In reply to: Yuri Victorovich : "Re: git: d22f15315b93 - main - devel/gmake43: Corrections"
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2024 21:51:03 UTC
On Fri 29 Mar 14:17, Yuri Victorovich wrote: > On 3/29/24 13:56, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > > As I have been told by other this is not explicit enough, an explicit version of > > this email is: please revert gmake43 addition we are not at a point where it is > > actually required. > > > But should the users of science/nwchem do (at some point I was one of them)? They can use the quarterly branch for now. > > With gmake-4.4.1 it builds for 20+ hours and times out. > > Try 'pkg search nwchem' - it isn't found. > > They aren't going to quickly fix the build. It isn't slightly broken, it is > broken a lot, and has always been. With gmake-4.3 it is also unnecessarily > slow, but passable. > > > Are you suggesting to just revert the change, and make NWChem broken again? Give a chance to upstream to fix (you contacted them only a couple of hours ago) Give a chance to others to analyse and provide a workaround. > > Could you please elaborate how is this going to make thing better? > > Is it worse to have one extra devel/gmakeNN version used to work around this > problem and fix the failure, or to keep science/nwchem broken? Because we don't always need a hammer to kill a fly, when we will have no other solution left then maybe this will be time to evaluate gmake43, but we are not there yet. Best regards, Bapt