From nobody Thu Jun 08 04:32:44 2023 X-Original-To: dev-commits-ports-all@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4QcBCv11CXz4bQ70; Thu, 8 Jun 2023 04:33:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from 6yearold@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vk1-f177.google.com (mail-vk1-f177.google.com [209.85.221.177]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1D4" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4QcBCt6MKPz4ChS; Thu, 8 Jun 2023 04:33:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from 6yearold@gmail.com) Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none Received: by mail-vk1-f177.google.com with SMTP id 71dfb90a1353d-462e3a806cbso44962e0c.3; Wed, 07 Jun 2023 21:33:14 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1686198793; x=1688790793; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=hltjFUxUtGo7R4jhLTuTM9/SdMBYHg6kldLCv0Vyoi4=; b=P3IEN1MP0riTTKugc4hGpAhyF6vhAQoExXq84ugisf9LNCtDGJ2IlqAIBA9eDV6X63 futN7cPRhFhDvie6l/fCLwS2j9nSAvVCkgCG9z5MuZNErAkqOJwrJPeBr1doetyHiuly tRqv6qphCgVRopc6BrulLODoglMTRm7q2cfk45qJ6kIQBzvrgeNFdW57sJm1OaF5azk0 Wes3hQ6FQDWACHU1pAzqE+bHj/WlaynrFjyWVrToDy9E0G61vCUz/V7r11PaGfJofZCn 4lFcOBgQEWLkBLUOzrK02MMxlQDtPSMVxpCGcUyEdmPpt0uPonUwpo4q6iePeJftnIiY 4eiQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AC+VfDz9587UvWGXOuDWk0Frymjxg2hETlyi+F13W9uiX0Li1wt9ww07 N9USfLX1FVMrJw0xwOsifRPy2Ded2fMxh10v X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACHHUZ73i6R9Hy1OwS28dKHtrwv8O8IyOUL+k+pGlhCbWVSL6NqINlXYSBzyNxhcEeWwxjYWEPqHuw== X-Received: by 2002:a1f:6009:0:b0:463:c9b3:9e12 with SMTP id u9-20020a1f6009000000b00463c9b39e12mr2697514vkb.6.1686198793272; Wed, 07 Jun 2023 21:33:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-vk1-f176.google.com (mail-vk1-f176.google.com. [209.85.221.176]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id e5-20020ab031c5000000b00783a45d39e6sm63132uan.28.2023.06.07.21.33.12 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 07 Jun 2023 21:33:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-vk1-f176.google.com with SMTP id 71dfb90a1353d-462a2998bceso46249e0c.2; Wed, 07 Jun 2023 21:33:12 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 2002:a1f:6186:0:b0:43c:6e7d:60b0 with SMTP id v128-20020a1f6186000000b0043c6e7d60b0mr2194776vkb.15.1686198792625; Wed, 07 Jun 2023 21:33:12 -0700 (PDT) List-Id: Commit messages for all branches of the ports repository List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/dev-commits-ports-all List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-dev-commits-ports-all@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: dev-commits-ports-all@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <202306071902.357J2dMR036544@gitrepo.freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: From: Gleb Popov Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2023 07:32:44 +0300 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: git: d14c324e9492 - main - Haskell ports: Fix dependency on GHC 9.2 after its upgrade. To: Ashish SHUKLA Cc: ports-committers@freebsd.org, dev-commits-ports-all@freebsd.org, dev-commits-ports-main@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4QcBCt6MKPz4ChS X-Spamd-Bar: ---- X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:209.85.128.0/17, country:US] X-Rspamd-Pre-Result: action=no action; module=replies; Message is reply to one we originated X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N On Wed, Jun 7, 2023 at 11:21=E2=80=AFPM Ashish SHUKLA = wrote: > > > Apart from updating BUILD_DEPENDS to fix the build error, I think you > also need to bump PORTREVISION as these packages now built with GHC > 9.2.8 may have different output compared to when they was built with GHC > 9.2.7 while retaining the same PKGNAME. > > HTH > -- > Ashish SHUKLA | GPG: F682 CDCC 39DC 0FEA E116 20B6 C746 CFA9 E74F A4B0 > The build was failing before, so no packages were ever produced. Also, this GHC upgrade is a very minor one, so it certainly doesn't need a bump.