Re: git: 61e4a788ecab - main - ports-mgmt/dialog4ports: mark as deprecated and broken on current
- Reply: Baptiste Daroussin : "Re:_git:_61e4a788ecab_-_main_-_ports-mgmt/dialog 4ports:_mark_as_deprecated_and_broken_on_current"
- Reply: Baptiste Daroussin : "Re: git: 61e4a788ecab - main - ports-mgmt/dialog4ports: mark as deprecated and broken on current"
- In reply to: Baptiste Daroussin : "Re: git: 61e4a788ecab - main - ports-mgmt/dialog4ports: mark as deprecated and broken on current"
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2023 06:01:35 UTC
21.12.2023 21:03, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > First clearly none of those looks shitty to me! > > Anyway according to you which one do you fine neater and more convenient ? > > - https://bapt.nours.eu/1.png > - https://bapt.nours.eu/2.png Note that bsddialog-produced output depends on compiler due to a bug both in ports version of bsddialog utility and one in our base: it allocates "struct bsddialog_conf conf" on stack and fails to zero it, so it uses garbage for its contents including ascii_lines property that is supposed to be zero (disabled) but really can contain non-zero garbage. Eugene Grosbein