Re: git: 61e4a788ecab - main - ports-mgmt/dialog4ports: mark as deprecated and broken on current
- Reply: Baptiste Daroussin : "Re: git: 61e4a788ecab - main - ports-mgmt/dialog4ports: mark as deprecated and broken on current"
- In reply to: Baptiste Daroussin : "Re: git: 61e4a788ecab - main - ports-mgmt/dialog4ports: mark as deprecated and broken on current"
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2023 14:23:58 UTC
Hello! On Thu, 21 Dec 2023 at 15:03:26 (+0100), Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > First clearly none of those looks shitty to me! > Anyway according to you which one do you fine neater and more convenient ? > - https://bapt.nours.eu/1.png > - https://bapt.nours.eu/2.png Well, your pictures look a way better than what I see on my end =( Here's my mileage (it might obviously be something with my terminal app (I use `mlterm`), but anyways): - dialog4ports: https://i.imgur.com/cZHLBN4.png - portconfig: https://i.imgur.com/0xKF3f1.pngO - portconfig with "D4PASCIILINES=yes" set just fails and breaks terminal so I need to `reset` it afterwards: https://i.imgur.com/zg85JsW.png ps: I must admit that I'm on an outdated version of FreeBSD though and this may be a culprit for the `portconfig` to display port options properly (whilst `dialog4ports` has no issues like that at all). So my UX may not be taken into account (EOL'ed versions of FreeBSD aren't supported), while I'd really be keen to keep `dialog4ports` as the only decent port config management UI for me. If possible. Thanks. -- George L. Yermulnik [YZ-RIPE]