Re: git: 645419c8e465 - main - multimedia/x265: upgrade to 3.5. Finally...
- Reply: Moin Rahman : "Re: git: 645419c8e465 - main - multimedia/x265: upgrade to 3.5. Finally..."
- Reply: Mikhail T.: "Re: git: 645419c8e465 - main - multimedia/x265: upgrade to 3.5. Finally..."
- In reply to: Moin Rahman : "Re: git: 645419c8e465 - main - multimedia/x265: upgrade to 3.5. Finally..."
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2023 00:13:50 UTC
16.12.2023 02:59, Moin Rahman пишет: >> On Dec 16, 2023, at 12:54 AM, Mikhail T.<mi+t@virtual-estates.net> wrote: >> >> 15.12.23 18:43, Vladimir Druzenko: >>> Hi! >>> >>> pkg-static: Unable to access file /tmp/work/usr/ports/multimedia/x265/work/stage/usr/local/lib/libx265.so:No such file or directory >>> pkg-static: Unable to access file /tmp/work/usr/ports/multimedia/x265/work/stage/usr/local/lib/libx265.so.200:No such file or directory >>> pkg-static: Unable to access file /tmp/work/usr/ports/multimedia/x265/work/stage/usr/local/libdata/pkgconfig/x265.pc:No such file or directory >>> >>> Options : >>> ASM : on >>> DEBUG : off >>> HI10P : on >>> HI12P : on >>> HI8P : on >>> OPTIMIZED_FLAGS: on >>> SVTHEVC : on >>> VMAF : off >> I just rebuilt from scratch here -- on 14.x -- and not seeing these errors: make check-plist succeeds. And so does make package. >> >> I'll try now on a different 13.x machine, but, perhaps, you can check your setup too? >> -mi > So you want to say that you have committed a port without any detailed testing on other versions for such a port which has lots of consumers? > > Because the error is same for all versions. > > https://pkg.bofh.network/data/124i386-default/2023-12-16_00h04m14s/logs/errors/x265-3.5.log > https://pkg.bofh.network/data/124-default/2023-12-16_00h07m41s/logs/errors/x265-3.5.log > https://pkg.bofh.network/data/132-default/2023-12-16_00h12m27s/logs/errors/x265-3.5.log > https://pkg.bofh.network/data/140-default/2023-12-16_00h17m22s/logs/errors/x265-3.5.log > > Kind regards, > Moin In poudriere with default options 100% reproducible. On one host with 374 ports installed fails too. On other host (desktop) with 1998 ports installed build without errors - probably something important installed and it grab this silently. -- Best regards, Vladimir Druzenko