Re: git: 72ad532057c9 - main - archivers/zstd: Add CMake config files and adjust Makefile
Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2023 08:02:41 UTC
On 2023-04-10 01:47, Po-Chuan Hsieh wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, Apr 7, 2023 at 5:36 AM Dima Panov <fluffy@freebsd.org> wrote: > >> Moin-moin! >> >> On 06.04.2023 16:32, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: >>> On Thu, Apr 06, 2023 at 03:19:55PM +0200, Guido Falsi wrote: >>>> On 06/04/23 15:17, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: >>>>> On Wed, Apr 05, 2023 at 02:20:21PM +0200, Guido Falsi wrote: >>>>>> On 05/04/23 08:15, Daniel Engberg wrote: >>>>>>> commit 72ad532057c9f9fb6fa370c80f663c005e9dd021 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> archivers/zstd: Add CMake config files and adjust Makefile >>>>>>> >>>>>>> - Use upstream's short test for "make test" >>>>>>> - Use verbose output by default during build >>>>>>> * Tweak Makefile to follow Porters Handbook more closely >>>>>>> * Install CMake files (taken from CMake build framework) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> PR: 267652 >>>>>>> Reported by: fluffy >>>>>>> Approved by: portmgr (maintainer timeout, 1+ month) >>>>>> >>>>>> Looks like this, un[luckily], causes a failure with devel/qt6-base >>>>>> (abridged error, full log if needed): >>>>>> >>>>>> ld: error: relocation R_X86_64_32 cannot be used against local >>>>>> symbol; >>>>>> recompile with -fPIC >>>>>>>>> defined in /usr/local/lib/libzstd.a(zstd_common.o) >>>>>>>>> referenced by zstd_common.c >>>>>>>>> zstd_common.o:(ZSTD_versionString) in archive >>>>> >>>>> Yeah, I'm seeing this as well. Admittedly, the whole commit looks >>>>> dubious to me, with all these out-of-blue new files and gratuitous >>>>> changes. I guess sunpoet@ should revert it and merge only needed >>>>> parts thereof properly. >> >> Nope. >> This commit unmasked the real problem of using autocrap tools to build >> zstd -- a broken static library. >> Issue was not raised before 'cause cmake configs was absent and qt6 >> (and may be other consumers) hooks up only shared lib. > > It should be fixed in ports 454e3c91ae9105a9af1939c9632424083ed3bbdb. > I've tested unmodified devel/qt6-base and it builds fine. > >> Just to be clear -- I have a version of port converted to pure cmake >> build and >> it produce a valid static library which correctly liked by any >> consumer. >> >> Anyway, number of consumers which require cmake'd zstd will grow in >> near future. >> openimageio/opencolorio/opnehadinglanguage are already require it to >> push >> new versions to the ports tree. > > Please let me know if more ports are broken. > >>>> >>>> I have only reported the issue as an early warning, as I said. >>>> >>>> Regarding qt6-base a fix has already been proposed here by diizzy: >>>> >>>> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=270664 >>> >>> Ah, good to know it's being taken care of, thanks for sharing! >> >> Nope. This patch not fixes anything but masking the real issue with >> broken >> libzstd.a by prefer dynamic library over static to link. >> >> -- >> Sincerely, >> Dima (fluffy@FreeBSD.org, https://t.me/FluffyBSD) >> (desktop, kde, x11, office, ports-secteam)@FreeBSD team > >> Hi, > >> According to upstream this is not a good idea, > >> https://github.com/facebook/zstd/issues/2233#issuecomment-655600389 > >> Best regards, > >> Daniel