From nobody Mon Oct 17 12:46:38 2022 X-Original-To: dev-commits-ports-all@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4MrcFB71ZBz4fsn3; Mon, 17 Oct 2022 12:46:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danfe@freebsd.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [96.47.72.132]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "freefall.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4MrcFB6Vs7z3vmv; Mon, 17 Oct 2022 12:46:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danfe@freebsd.org) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1666010798; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=5KJ/2yt5cnWTeKXsrlb4I5h9wjFn69zqqB0b4BQ35Ic=; b=PfbpdPrRgIho7llRCMjVoNTzOOnlrtVS32QYm+vZibuADlibmZuxlf2BWqde5X7x348lj9 9h44HJfOHlyLxtb/LhdzVr0lBMYLfC0B1tBLiLclRm0zAIt0WeiNtCMbZHBHhwUGtnLdRq IUsp0dqwohpegacFBSJvCnZ4X9kqOsu7ho7q9SdOdCPwW+qDb6sh0gRryAIRCF/zzRUGwa oQt0nvBySaGJTTvoWmbHCXTlVwt/UJ5kVMTbHIeSrr/qtGAeLQuoXOaQr0HwGGDlVgk1dU taXWcC3s+X63FURv+Oh0YGP+iy95LhVvQlATIbk+pljBsM1v6ooUszRtpq+9MA== Received: by freefall.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1033) id C95CEF4FB; Mon, 17 Oct 2022 12:46:38 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2022 12:46:38 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev To: Mathieu Arnold Cc: Nuno Teixeira , Baptiste Daroussin , ports-committers@freebsd.org, dev-commits-ports-all@freebsd.org, dev-commits-ports-main@freebsd.org Subject: Re: git: 2b9b771202b2 - main - www/luakit-devel: update to 2.3.1-6 Message-ID: References: <202210121908.29CJ8aGO082553@gitrepo.freebsd.org> <20221013134520.vresa2tbdkflowdw@aniel.nours.eu> <20221016083759.vx46x6ei7if6dxuy@aching.in.mat.cc> <20221017092451.6qf4z6gmez7pd2hj@aching.in.mat.cc> List-Id: Commit messages for all branches of the ports repository List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/dev-commits-ports-all List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-dev-commits-ports-all@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: dev-commits-ports-all@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20221017092451.6qf4z6gmez7pd2hj@aching.in.mat.cc> ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1666010798; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=5KJ/2yt5cnWTeKXsrlb4I5h9wjFn69zqqB0b4BQ35Ic=; b=t8+V1Jv740iMZmYOg+X2e18iu+CgHnsP8DoKbamYZ6pLk/mDBHM2kZywRMYP1M8jWsLiGQ WJ91iCgVpqPJ2KcZXYhk/W53LKC2IJX9uE9Gl03aC+d5EOrOBE4zaXJxFndiGeFRGvar9U Euz10A24n4RFX8XZrpH+WGX5Lk17sB0HimquYVQcsZ197+dfx6VpfMT7pQN3fVwh42SCiI dA8rW22SDM5+B6BxmMshHuR7vjjU95L+D1rGGU2YxiruUR1dOCDTOSffEjRx7xvlj9odw3 cmpuVt+2t0B/d4NOnYxmdnCFpkk9dMZYnJkezZHWLuTBeUieLz7e0jMNeTEoFw== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=dkim; d=freebsd.org; t=1666010798; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=chGyk+YeNkrXn63UbSd/9pC2YX1sp++AohhqIXR9Wph0gQSlG6sJVd1lS8pB8WZ7bt+s1Q qZTC2JqLH2jeAoulzamLv9ghFHTwtubJSqkW+v1j9qzG9kUUUIgFj+88VnAvSxZ12BgXd7 2ro0pLFyhVGySiBD+G7UGTWQF2m3vbAyhmzoCOsVUbZEId1gq7kRkj/CL/BE35DOd2pHSK juB+KEGbxeXvyT90lQ60wHr9x1SAPvxx1RlqTYdSQpBSZzcGoVGJUmZz257xQW38BXERqT JtBhtot0NZFGMy+ldkVIgFnNFuoDIyH/VWmLMuvYdTyQuJSbwFr0ZpmASgyxHQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx1.freebsd.org; none X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N On Mon, Oct 17, 2022 at 11:24:51AM +0200, Mathieu Arnold wrote: > On Sun, Oct 16, 2022 at 01:21:09PM +0100, Nuno Teixeira wrote: > > portepoch should be used with caution and when is no chance to avoid > > it, e.g., upstream versioning changes. > > PORTEPOCH should be used when it is needed, like any tool. Except it pessimizes package version and once it's there, it's very hard to get rid of (can only happen alongside with PKGNAME change). There're reasons why people try to avoid PORTEPOCH, ideally it should be used as a last resort and looks like this is not the case here if upstream would be willing to sanitize their version numbering scheme. It's not like any tool, it's a particularly disgusting one. ./danfe