Re: git: 9204a735d9a8 - main - net/storj: update Storj programs to version 1.47.3.

On Wed, 2022-01-26 at 13:43, Joseph Mingrone <jrm@FreeBSD.org> wrote:

> On Wed, 2022-01-26 at 04:36, Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@freebsd.org> wrote:

>> On Tue, Jan 25, 2022 at 11:31:24AM -0800, Yuri wrote:
>>> On 1/25/22 11:17, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
>>> >      net/storj: update Storj programs to version 1.47.3.

>>> * 'Storj' - port name repeated

>> Only because I'm forced to prepend stupid "cat/port" patch which I strip
>> locally when browsing commits: this information is redundant as it can be
>> inferred from the commit itself.

> By that logic it is also stupid to put 'Storj' in the message, since it
> can also be extracted from the commit itself.  Using that same logic
> it's also stupid to put 'update to version 1.47.3', since it can also be
> extracted from the commit.

> What not just write
  ^ s/What/Why/

> net/storj: update to 1.47.3

> rather than

> net/storj: update Storj programs to version 1.47.3.?

> The first message is concise, conveys the same information, and follows
> a formatting standard, which makes browsing and searching commits
> easier.