Re: git: a87cbe0b5e6a - main - lang/pocl: port to powerpc64
- In reply to: Alexey Dokuchaev : "Re: git: a87cbe0b5e6a - main - lang/pocl: port to powerpc64"
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2021 15:37:36 UTC
Thanks for suggestion, I'll do it once soon. Anyway, I tested it also on powerpc (32-bit) and it doesn't build, so it may make some sense to limit the architecture scope. On 21-11-16 13:49:30, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > On Tue, Nov 16, 2021 at 12:10:54PM +0000, Piotr Kubaj wrote: > > commit a87cbe0b5e6ad85dd21908b7943f6b11e0fb44ef > > > > lang/pocl: port to powerpc64 > > --- > > lang/pocl/Makefile | 11 +++++++++-- > > lang/pocl/pkg-plist | 1 + > > 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/lang/pocl/Makefile b/lang/pocl/Makefile > > index 053e00841a4f..6f6388df4e6d 100644 > > --- a/lang/pocl/Makefile > > +++ b/lang/pocl/Makefile > > @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ COMMENT= POrtable Computing Language (POCL) > > LICENSE= MIT > > LICENSE_FILE= ${WRKSRC}/LICENSE > > > > -ONLY_FOR_ARCHS= aarch64 amd64 i386 > > +ONLY_FOR_ARCHS= aarch64 amd64 i386 powerpc64 > > ONLY_FOR_ARCHS_REASON= only tested on x86 > > I guess you should've also reworded or even removed ONLY_FOR_ARCHS_REASON > as it does not make much sense now. Admittedly, it looks very like that > ONLY_FOR_ARCHS had been misused here, as "portable" computing language > should be, well, portable and not tied to a particular architecture or > two^three^wfour. > > ./danfe