Re: Tooling Integration and Developer Experience

From: ykla <yklaxds_at_gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2023 17:06:21 UTC
Hi,

The documentation project on reviews.freebsd.org is also very inactive. For
example, it's been almost 3 months since I submitted my revision -
https://reviews.freebsd.org/D37322. After I submitted it, it was neither
reviewed nor approved for a long time. Now, due to changes in the FreeBSD
documentation, some of my changes conflict with the current documentation
and are difficult to resolve. I suppose I could spend some time going over
it again and again, but if no one accepts it, it is pointless. Maybe I
shouldn't make such extensive changes to the documentation.Can you advise
me on how I should go about doing this? Thanks a lot.

ykla

Kurt Jaeger <pi@freebsd.org> 于2023年1月30日周一 18:33写道:

> Hello,
>
> > I had a similar thing happen to me, the mailing list FreeBSD-doc seemed
> to
> > exist as if no one existed, and there was no one posting in it except for
> > the automated bug reports from the bots.
> > I have not had any replies to my several posts either.
>
> > So can the admins tell how many people actually
> > subscribe to FreeBSD-doc,
>
> The list has 496 subscribers right now. (speaking as one of postmaster@).
>
> > or is this just a place to report bugs and people
> > should discuss FreeBSD doc-related issues elsewhere? Or is it that almost
> > nobody cares about the FreeBSD documentation?
>
> From my observation, the last few month led to a huge pile of
> workload on many folks that are involved with FreeBSD stuff, so
> not many folks had time to reply/think things through/answer.
> I had the same problem...
>
> I see doc-stuff happen mostly on reviews.freebsd.org. (speaking
> as one of phabric-admins). Pau Amma is the most active docs-person
> as far as I can see. I have not calculated stats, just my gut feeling.
>
> --
> pi@opsec.eu            +49 171 3101372                    Now what ?
>
>