[Bug 266879] fusefs, net/glusterfs: GlusterFS mount not handled as expected

Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]

From: <bugzilla-noreply_at_freebsd.org>
Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2022 01:31:51 UTC

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=266879

--- Comment #6 from Alan Somers <asomers@FreeBSD.org> ---
(In reply to David from comment #5)
> Hmmm FUSE direct_io mount option which I have used or sysctl
Yes, fusefs does implement direct_io.

> does fuse  evict invalidated cache contents on fuse_write_directbackend? or ? does it read the gluster options?

This depends on what gluster does.  Early FUSE protocol levels didn't provide
any primitives for keeping the cache coherent.  Later ones do.  You may be able
to tell which protocol level glusterfs is using if the daemon has some kind of
--verbose option.

> Sorry I'm a bit confused now, doest the BSD implementation of FUSE honour the gluster options?

What options?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.