Re: 14-CURRENT Kernel Panic due to USB hub?

From: Andrew Turner <andrew_at_fubar.geek.nz>
Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2021 17:34:51 UTC
Can you create a bug for this in bugzilla so we can keep track of it?

Andrew

> On 21 Nov 2021, at 07:18, Daniel Morante via freebsd-arm <freebsd-arm@freebsd.org> wrote:
> 
> Here's the bt:
> 
> ugen0.2: <Generic 4-Port USB 3.0 Hub> at usbus0 (disconnected)
> uhub5: at uhub0, port 1, addr 1 (disconnected)
> uhub5: detached
> ugen0.2: <Generic 4-Port USB 3.0 Hub> at usbus0
> uhub5 numa-domain 0 on uhub0
> uhub5: <Interrupt In Interface> on usbus0
> uhub5: 4 ports with 4 removable, self powered
> ugen0.2: <Generic 4-Port USB 3.0 Hub> at usbus0 (disconnected)
> uhub5: at uhub0, port 1, addr 1 (disconnected)
> uhub5: detached
> panic: data abort with spinlock held
> cpuid = 108
> time = 1637478997
> KDB: stack backtrace:
> db_trace_self() at db_trace_self
> KDB: enter: panic
> [ thread pid 11 tid 100111 ]
> Stopped at      kdb_enter+0x44: undefined       f901411f
> db> bt
> Tracing pid 11 tid 100111 td 0xffffa00005619580
> db_trace_self() at db_trace_self
> db>
> 
> On 11/12/2021 5:52 AM, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
>> On 11/12/21 00:43, Daniel Morante via freebsd-arm wrote:
>>> ugen0.2: <Generic 4-Port USB 3.0 Hub> at usbus0 (disconnected)
>>> uhub5: at uhub0, port 1, addr 1 (disconnected)
>>> uhub5: detached
>>> ugen0.2: <Generic 4-Port USB 3.0 Hub> at usbus0
>>> uhub5 numa-domain 0 on uhub0
>>> uhub5: <Interrupt In Interface> on usbus0
>>> uhub5: 4 ports with 4 removable, self powered
>>> 
>>> I suspect these problems are caused by the above detaching/reattaching.
>> 
>> Can you type "bt" in the panic prompt?
>> 
>> --HPS
>>