Re: git: 07c64d74917e - main - acpica: Import ACPICA 20230628

From: Cy Schubert <Cy.Schubert_at_cschubert.com>
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2024 20:43:55 UTC
In message <737703f2-26a6-4a84-a64b-3fa55cad721c@FreeBSD.org>, Andriy Gapon 
wri
tes:
> On 31/01/2024 19:40, Cy Schubert wrote:
> > In message <04c4a0e1-aa79-4d25-a1f7-2196cfa65578@FreeBSD.org>, Jung-uk Kim
> > writ
> > es:
> >> On 24. 1. 31., Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> >>> Hello,
> >>>
> >>> Either this one or the previous import is breaking arm64 build
> >>>
> >>> --- acpi_iort.o ---
> >>> /home/bapt/worktrees/main/sys/arm64/acpica/acpi_iort.c:103:4: error: fiel
> d
> >>> 'data' with variable sized type 'union (unnamed union at
> >>> /home/bapt/worktrees/main/sys/arm64/acpica/acpi_iort.c:98:2
> >>> )' not at the end of a struct or class is a GNU extension
> >>> [-Werror,-Wgnu-variable-sized-type-not-at-end]
> >>>     103 |         } data;
> >>>           |           ^
> >>
> >> Sorry for the breakage.  I will fix it soon.
> >>
> >> BTW, this code was added by this:
> >>
> >> https://reviews.freebsd.org/D31267
> >>
> >> It seems struct iort_named_component was a hack, which duplicated
> >> ACPI_IORT_NAMED_COMPONENT but with a fixed length field DeviceName[32].
> >> Is it really necessary?
> > 
> > Though they incorporated the WOL patch I've been using, they've broken
> > poweroff.
>
> The poweroff issue could be because of 9cdf326b4f

Thanks. I clued into that a while ago after taking a break to read the ML.

This smelled of the original WOL problem I had last year that required 
pulling the plug to allow the NIC to see the magic packet, but worse. Hence 
I was barking up the wrong tree.


-- 
Cheers,
Cy Schubert <Cy.Schubert@cschubert.com>
FreeBSD UNIX:  <cy@FreeBSD.org>   Web:  https://FreeBSD.org
NTP:           <cy@nwtime.org>    Web:  https://nwtime.org

			e^(i*pi)+1=0