Re: git: 28472e9722d8 - main - Revert "x11-fonts/noto*: Restructure and update"

From: Po-Chuan Hsieh <sunpoet_at_freebsd.org>
Date: Sat, 23 Mar 2024 16:12:07 UTC
On Sat, Mar 23, 2024 at 11:38 PM Tobias C. Berner <tcberner@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Am Samstag, 23. März 2024, 15:14:01 CET schrieb Gleb Popov:
> > On Sat, Mar 23, 2024 at 5:04 PM Po-Chuan Hsieh <sunpoet@freebsd.org>
> wrote:
> > > The branch main has been updated by sunpoet:
> > >
> > > URL:
> > >
> https://cgit.FreeBSD.org/ports/commit/?id=28472e9722d808739a4d690f6d803a2
> > > b1b8f5f98
> > >
> > > commit 28472e9722d808739a4d690f6d803a2b1b8f5f98
> > > Author:     Po-Chuan Hsieh <sunpoet@FreeBSD.org>
> > > AuthorDate: 2024-03-23 14:01:07 +0000
> > > Commit:     Po-Chuan Hsieh <sunpoet@FreeBSD.org>
> > > CommitDate: 2024-03-23 14:01:07 +0000
> > >
> > >     Revert "x11-fonts/noto*: Restructure and update"
> > >
> > >     This reverts commit 3b128ff9f74b28ada2f475f0b816480b1550e5b8.
> >
> > It is good manners to explain the reason for reverting when doing it.
> > Even better to first talk to the original committer and ask him to the
> > revert.
>
> Moin moin
>
> I completely agree. Given that there has been a phabricator review open
> for
> two months, with you, sunpoet@ as reviewer, this is looking like poor
> judgement on your side.
>
> As arrowd@ points out, you should have commented on the reverted commit
> first,
> and elaborate your reasoning for a revert.
>
> Simply reverting the work of others may lead to fewer contributions.
> Please
> take this into consideration in the future.
>
>
> mfg Tobias


Hello,

I'm sorry that I did not put enough information in this reverting commit
because I need it to be done ASAP so that less users are affected.
There are several reasons I reverted it by myself instead of
requesting tijl@ to do so.
First, I do not use phab review therefore I did not really review the patch
which means it is committed without maintainer approval.
Second, I already have my own work for noto updates which is totally in
different direction with tijl@'s work. I cannot simply rebase my work onto
it.
Third, The problem mentioned in the PR is also handled in my own work.

Regards,
sunpoet